Bohemond Claimed Antioch

Bohemond was in contact with a tower commander. Evidence of this watchman is unknown, buried in the passage of time. Historian Thomas Asbridge suggests that the man who Bohemond befriended was an Armenian whose name was Firuz. Behomond learnt that Firuz despised Yaghi Siyan and was scheming to betray him. Yet, even those firsthand accounts of the fall of Antioch conflict with each other.

“The Franks came to an agreement with the commander of one of Antioch’s towers, a breastplate-maker called Firuz: they promised him silver and considerable wealth if he would betray the city to them,” wrote the twelfth century Muslim chronicler, Ibn al-Athir.

According to what had been written in the Gesta Account, “there was a certain Emir of the race of the Turks, whose name was Pirus, who took up the greatest friendship with Bohemond…Bohemond often pressed this man to receive him within the city in a most friendly fashion, and after promising Christianity to him most freely, he sent word that he would make him (Pirus) rich with much honor.”

Regardless of the tower commander’s real identity, he did willingly betray Antioch.

On the night of 2-3 June, several of Bohemond’s men scaled an isolated section of the city’s south-eastern wall to where Firuz awaited them while Bohemond waited below. Firuz and Bohemond’s men quickly and quietly killed the guards at the three nearest towers and then hastened to open a small postern gate below. Bohemond shattered the silence when he sounded the bugles. As if on cue, men rushed from the crusader camp, shouting, “God wills it! God wills it!”

Those Christians who had survived persecution at the hands of Yaghi Siyan turned on their Muslim overlords and opened the remaining gates. The crusaders rushed in and mercilessly slaughtered every Muslim they encountered, including women and children. “We cannot say how many Turks and Saracens then perished; it is, furthermore, cruel to explain by what diverse and various deaths they died,” wrote Raymond d’Aguilers. Among the Muslim dead were Christians, for in the black of the night, the crusaders could not see well who they were attacking.

Most of the soldiers of the Turkish garrison managed to escape, retreating to the citadel atop of Mount Silpius. However, not all of them remained at that citadel. Ibn al-Athir wrote that “Yaghi Siyan was seized with fear and, giving orders for one of the town gates to be opened, he fled, accompanied only by thirty attendants.” Before Yaghi Siyan fled Antioch, he left his son in charge of what remained of his garrison at the Mount Silpius citadel. Yaghi Siyan would have likely fared much better if he would have remained with his son because, in the countryside, he was spotted by a group of Armenian peasants. They pursued him and cut off his head.

In the midst of all the bloodshed and looting, Bohemond staked his claim to Antioch by raising his red banner high above the city. Meanwhile, Raymond of Toulouse rode through the Bridge Gate and claimed all of the buildings in that corner of the city, including the palace of Antioch.

Bohemond was ecstatic. He had coordinated Antioch’s capture and now the city was his. But his excitement was short lived. On 4 June, the next day, the vanguard of Kerbogha’s army arrived. The crusaders were back to where they had started. Only this time, they were the besieged, surrounded by Kerbogha’s much stronger army.

Sources Used:

Asbridge, Thomas. The Crusades: The Authoritative History of The War For The Holy Land. Ecco; New York, 2011.

Krey, August C. The First Crusade: The Accounts of Eye-Witnesss and Participants. Princeton; Princeton University Press, 1921.

Various contributors. Chronicles of the Crusades: Eye-Witness Accounts of The Wars Between Christianity and Islam. Bramley Books; Portugal, 1997.

 

Categories: The First Crusade, The Siege of Antioch | Tags: , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Crusade in Jeopardy

By the spring of 1098, the crusaders had managed to cut off Yaghi Siyan’s connection to the outside world even though they had only maintained a partial blockade of the city. Turkish aggression against the crusaders also came to a halt. The Muslims were now on the defensive, faced with the same hardships as the Christians had endured since the fall of 1097: isolation, starvation and the fear of impending defeat.

The crusaders, though, did not continue the siege without trepidation. They despaired over the prospect of a large, unified, fierce Muslim army, marching on Antioch to Yaghi Siyan’s aid. Should that happen, the crusaders would be trapped between two enemies, severely outnumbered and unable to defend themselves.

Meanwhile, they took the advice of Alexius Comnenus and used the schism between Sunnis and Shi’ites to their advantage. In the summer of 1097, the crusaders had established friendly connections with the Shi’ite Fatimids of Egypt. When the vizier al-Afdal of Egypt learnt that the Latins were at Antioch, he sent an embassy to negotiate terms of settlement with them. Their visit was not short: the Fatimid embassy remained in the crusader camp for about a month. Both Christians and Muslims seemed to enjoy each other’s company even though they never reached an agreement. Regardless, the Muslims offered the Christians “promises of friendship and favorable treatment,” a pact the crusaders eagerly embraced.

An alliance with the Fatimids of Egypt did open up the road to Jerusalem, but it did not dispel the threat posed by the Turks. In May 1098, the crusaders’ worst fear became a reality: news spread throughout the camp that Kerbogha, the Sultan of Baghdad, had raised a large army and was marching on Antioch to crush the Latin threat once and for all. The princes hastily convened a council meeting and discussed a course of action. They came to the conclusion that their army was in no way prepared to confront that of Kerbogha’s. Not only were the crusaders outnumbered, they had lost many of their valuable warhorses, the only means for them to mount a strategic defensive on the battlefield.

The Christians were in dire peril. The Crusade was in jeopardy. The princes must have felt helpless and terrified. Except for Bohemond. Bohemond believed that all was not lost: they could capture Antioch, but they would have to do it quickly because Kerbogha was less than one week’s march from Antioch. He proposed to the other princes that whoever could engineer Antioch’s fall should have right to claim the city as his. The other men, especially Raymond of Toulouse, vehemently protested his idea. But after a brief debate, they came to an agreement: Antioch would be handed over to the Emperor Alexius if he came to claim it. Thus began the game of treachery, a game Bohemond was determined to win.

To be continued on Wednesday, May 15th.

Sources Used:

Asbridge, Thomas. The Crusades: The Authoritative History of The War For The Holy Land. Ecco; New York, 2011.

 

Categories: The First Crusade, The Siege of Antioch | Tags: , , , | Leave a comment

Photos of Castles in Syria by Hazel Singer

Hazel Singer, a virtual acquaintance I connected with on Susan Abernethy’s renowned Medieval History Lovers Facebook page, was kind enough to share photos she had taken of Castles while in Syria.  She emailed me 25 photos, some of which I will share with you now. Most of these photos show the Templar castle, Krak des Chevaliers and Saladin’s castle.

Looking down at the 'entry plinth', Sal'adin. A bridge would connect to this plinth from the castle.

Looking down at the ‘entry plinth’, Sal’adin. A bridge would connect to this plinth from the castle.

 

Earliest chapel inside Krak des Chevaliers

 

Passageway, Krak des Chevaliers

 

Cloisters on the left at Krak des Chevaliers

 

Al Jaber, Lake Assad.

Al Jaber, Lake Assad.

 

Citadel above Palmyra/Tadmor

Citadel above Palmyra/Tadmor

 

 

 

Categories: Crusader Castles | Tags: , , , | Leave a comment

Treachery

By early 1098, the suffering inside the crusader camp had reached its climax. Hundreds, if not thousands, of pilgrims, knights and foot soldiers had perished from illness and malnourishment. To add to their misery, Yaghi Siyan began to torture and kill Antioch’s Christian population. The Greek patriarch was dangled from the battlements by his ankles and beaten with rods. Many Greeks, Syrians and Armenians were slaughtered. Their heads were then chopped off and catapulted over the walls into the crusader camp while the crusaders looked on in horror and grief.

Naturally, they began to believe that God had abandoned them and their war for His Holy Land. When questioned why, the Bishop of Le Puy offered them only one answer: the Holy War had become tainted with sin. “The Bishop prescribed a fast of three days and urged prayers and alms, together with a procession, upon the people; moreover he commanded the priests to devote themselves to masses and prayers, the clerics to psalms,” Raymond wrote. Bishop Adhemar of Le Puy also blamed the women for leading the men to commit acts of sin. So they were cast out of the camp.

In the meantime, the princes learnt that a large, relief army under the command of Ridwan of Aleppo was encamped at Harenc, less than twenty-five miles away from Antioch. In response to this threat, Bohemond led a reasonably large force to the Iron Bridge and lured the Turks into an ambush. They roundly defeated the Turkish army thanks to their tight discipline and prowess, a victory that earned Boehmond an even greater reputation amongst his fellow crusaders. “Our enemies and God’s straightaway fled before us, trying to enter their city. They were trying to cross over the great river, but we were close on their heels. Many we cast into the river, many we killed on top of the bridge, and many we slaughtered in front of the entrance to the gate,” Stephen of Blois recalled in a letter to his wife.

In early March, their situation improved even more. Shortly after Ridwan was defeated, an English fleet arrived at St. Symeon, bearing food and military supplies, much to the crusaders’ greatest relief. They were now able to rest, eat and strengthen their hold on Antioch. They built a fort — Christened La Mahomerie (The Blessed Mary) — opposite the Bridge Gate, across the Orontes River.

Fort La Mahomerie was intended to block Turkish forays from travelling to and from St. Symeon, but it needed to be garrisoned. Raymond of Toulouse took on that responsibility: he paid a great deal of money out of his treasury in order to garrison Fort La Mahomerie, but his actions were not entirely altruistic. Raymond wanted to be recognized as the commander of the crusade, but he had two formidable rivals: Bohemond and Tancred.

Four weeks after Fort La Mahomerie was built and garrisoned, Tancred established a force at a fortified monastery opposite the St. George Gate. However, starvation and desertion had cut the Christian army down a size, leaving them unable to complete a full blockade of Antioch.

The crusaders were left with only one workable strategy: treachery. It would became a game played amongst the princes: the first man to trick a Turk into opening a gate would be given control of Antioch and possibly be recognized as the commander of the crusade

Sources Used:

Asbridge, Thomas. The Crusades: The Authoritative History of The War For The Holy Land. Ecco; New York, 2011.

Hindley, Geoffrey. A Brief History of The Crusades. Constable & Robinson, Ltd; London, 2003.

Krey, August C. The First Crusade: The Accounts of Eye-Witnesss and Participants. Princeton; Princeton University Press, 1921.

Various contributors. Chronicles of the Crusades: Eye-Witness Accounts of The Wars Between Christianity and Islam. Bramley Books; Portugal, 1997.

 

Categories: The First Crusade, The Siege of Antioch | Tags: , , , | 1 Comment

Suffering Inside the Crusader Camp

The prospects of a swift defeat was far out of reach. By December, the crusaders had nearly exhausted their food supplies. They had stripped the surrounding countryside bare of its produce. For that reason, prices skyrocketed. Food was brought into the port at St. Symeon from Syria, the Island of Rhodes and Cyprus. Because these ships came from distant lands, the merchants charged the Franks an exorbitant amount of money and there wasn’t even enough food to feed the entire army. The Armenians also showed the crusaders no mercy: they demanded a profit on all food sold.

The crusaders encountered a new enemy: starvation. According to the Gesta Account, “Many of our men died because they did not have the means where with to buy at such a dear price.”

As autumn wore on, the suffering inside the crusader camp intensified. The unrelenting rains drenched and chilled them; rusted their weapons and rotted their bow-strings and armor. Come mid December, the princes decided they had to find food somewhere before malnutrition and disease decimated the entire army. They met to discuss their course of action and came up with only one solution: forage for food in the countryside. The princes had previously objected to leaving Antioch because of the Turkish threat. But at that point, they had no other solution for which to solve their dilemma. Bohemond volunteered to lead the expedition along with Robert of Flanders.

On 28 December, they set out with a large force, comprising of foot soldiers and mounted knights, to the district of Aleppo. They scoured the Aleppo countryside, seizing what little food they managed to find. Then, on 31 December, Bohemond and Robert encountered a large Turkish force — one made up of contingents from Jerusalem, Damascus and Aleppo — that was coming to aid Yaghi Siyan. The Turks divided their army in an attempt to surround the crusaders, but Bohemond and Robert’s combined forces defeated them, sending them fleeing in many directions.

Following that swift defeat, Bohemond and Robert continued their search for food, but after having found none, they returned to Antioch. Bohemond, though, did not give up: he searched the hilly landscape west of Antioch high and low. He discovered, much to his greatest dismay, that the wondering pilgrims had pillaged that land extensively. Furious, Bohemond berated them for their selfishness. He then returned to camp empty-handed, but was hailed victorious for trying.

In the eyes of the lower ranking knights, men-at-arms and pilgrims, Bohemond was a hero. Yet, he could not alleviate the suffering of his fellow Christians. None of the princes could for that matter. By early 1098, all of their food had run out. It seemed like the crusaders were fighting a losing battle. Godfrey of Bouillon and Raymond of Toulouse were ill and the army was hemorrhaging soldiers: several men abandoned the siege and joined forces with Baldwin in Armenia or returned home. Robert of Normandy retreated to the fort of Laodicea (Latakya): Tatikios, commander of the Byzantine contingent, headed north with his entire force to aid his Byzantine brethren in their campaign for the reconquest of Anatolia. The crusaders anticipated he would return with soldiers, food and military supplies. In fact, Tatikios had promised them that the Emperor Alexius would arrive in due time with all of these provisions.

Not every man managed to desert though. Peter the Hermt and William of Melun were pursued by Tancred and escorted back to camp. William was forced to stand inside Bohemond’s tent all night long, then, in the morning, was harshly upbraided by the Norman prince. Since everyone looked upon Peter as the great champion of crusading zeal and as a man of God, he was let off with a mere reprimand.

To be continued on Thursday, May 2nd.

Sources Used:

Hindley, Geoffrey. A Brief History of The Crusades. Constable & Robinson, Ltd; London, 2003.

Krey, August C. The First Crusade: The Accounts of Eye-Witnesss and Participants. Princeton; Princeton University Press, 1921.

Runciman, Steven. A History of the Crusades: The First Crusade. Vol.1. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 1951.

Yewdale, Ralph B. Bohemond I, Prince of Antioch. Princeton University Press; Princeton, 1917.

Categories: The First Crusade, The Siege of Antioch | Tags: , , , , | 1 Comment

Yaghi Siyan and the Franks

Yaghi Siyan, the aging commander of Antioch’s garrison, watched with trepidation as this large, organized Frankish army prepared to attack his city. He regularly sent out spies to visit the crusader camp with the careful instruction to sell them provisions. These spies then brought back news of Frankish military strategy. Until they were caught in the act by Bohemond. Bohemond took several of these spies as prisoners and declared that he was going to slay and then eat them. Terrified, the spies escaped and fled Antioch, spreading news of Frankish ferocity to their Muslim cohorts everywhere they went.

It was clear to Yaghi Siyan that the Franks were not going to abandon the siege. He had 5,000 skilled and highly trained soldiers at his disposal and was confident in the strength of Antioch’s surrounding wall. But how long would Antioch hold out against the onslaught of Franks? Not all of Antioch’s citizens were Muslim either. In fact, a great many of them were Christian: Greek Orthodox, Armenian and Syrian, all under the yoke of a Greek Patriarch. Yaghi Siyan did not trust any of these Christians.

****

The crusaders had traveled as far south without being annihilated simply because of how badly fractured the Muslim powers of Northern Syria were at that time. Ridwan of Aleppo and Duquq of Damascus, brothers, were embroiled in a civil war with each other. The Emirs of Antioch and of Homs were, for their own reasons, also drawn into the conflict. Yaghi Siyan, a vassal to Ridwan, considered himself semi-independent, commanding the garrison at Antioch according to his own best interests.

For that reason, the Muslims did not organize a fierce resistance against the crusaders. To them, the crusaders were nothing more than mercenaries in the service of the Emperor Alexius. Yet, when Yaghi Siyan saw how determined the Franks were to have his city, he put aside his hard feelings against his co-religionists and called on them for help.

Meanwhile, the Turks did not wait for the Franks to strike first. They began to harass the Franks, brutally murdering pilgrims who wandered into the countryside. The crusaders also came under attack by the Turks from Harem, a fortress situated east of Antioch, along the road to Aleppo.

Whether they were ready to attack or not, the crusaders had to stamp out these Turkish raids immediately. So, in the middle of November, Bohemond led an expedition to put an end to these raids. Adopting Turkish strategy, Bohemond ordered his advance guard to hide in the woods near Harem while the rest of his troops rode with him to meet the Turkish force from Harem. Bohemond lured them into an ambush. Many Turks were massacred. “We brought back more than two hundred of their heads into the camp, so that the people of Christ could rejoice,” Stephen of Blois wrote in one of his many letters to his wife, Adela.

That one victory boosted Bohemond’s popularity within the crusader camp, although the other princes did not recognize Bohemond as the commander of the Crusade. In fact, they had chosen Stephen of Blois as its commander simply because of his wealth and his lack of interest in obtaining territorial wealth in the East. But in the eyes of the rank n’ file, Bohemond was the true leader: he had more energy, prudence and military might than Stephen of Blois, Robert of Normandy and Raymond of Toulouse combined.

Sources Used:

Yewdale, Ralph B. Bohemond I, Prince of Antioch. Princeton University Press; Princeton, 1917.

Various contributors. Chronicles of the Crusades: Eye-Witness Accounts of The Wars Between Christianity and Islam. Bramley Books; Portugal, 1997.

Categories: The First Crusade, The Siege of Antioch | Tags: , , , , , | Leave a comment

Antioch: Mighty Fortress

Antioch, the crusaders discovered, was a mighty fortress; much stronger than that of Nicaea. The landscape surrounding the city enhanced its defenses. Antioch is strategically located between the Orontes River and the foothills of two mountains: Staurin and Silpius.

In the sixth century, the Romans had built a massive wall – about 3 miles long – around the city. “So fortified was it with walls and towers and barbicans, that it had no need to fear the assault of any machine or the attack of any man, not even if all mankind were to come together against it,” said Raymond D’Aguilers*. The wall boasted sixty towers, about three stories tall; high enough for any watchman to see the enemy advancing miles ahead.

The northern and western walls ran alongside the bank of the Orontes River, making the land in that area marshy, unfit for an army to lay siege. The southern and eastern walls ran up and along the mountainside. Near the peak of Mount Silpius stood a citadel. This citadel had been weathered by time and by earthquakes, yet it was still formidable. It warded off any advantage an attacking force would otherwise have.

Antioch was also known for its gates. There were five large gates: St. Paul’s Gate located in the east, the Dog’s Gate opening to the marshes, the Duke’s Gate, so called because Godfrey of Bouillon had camped his army outside that gate, St. Georges’ Gate to the west and the Bridge Gate. There were several smaller gates that opened to the mountains, enabling messengers to slip out of the city, unnoticed and unharmed, to seek reinforcements and/or food from allies.

There was literally no flat, dry stretch of land from where the crusaders could attack the city’s garrison. So, they were left with only two methods of assault: starvation and treachery. But first, they had to camp their army. Bohemond settled his troops in the hills, close to St. Paul’s Gate. Raymond of Toulouse took Dog’s Gate with his army and Godfrey remained outside of Duke’s Gate with his force. But there were three gates left unblocked, not to mention the ones that opened to the mountains. The Turks inside the city could freely come and go as they pleased.

Possibly for those reasons, the crusaders and the Turkish garrison fell into an uneasy stalemate. Pilgrims and warriors took advantage of the fertile countryside, feeding off the apple orchards and grape vineyards. The princes also planned their first offensive. They realized they didn’t have moveable siege towers, mangonels or scaling ladders, so they built a makeshift bridge across the Orontes River from which point they would attempt to strengthen their stranglehold on Antioch via partial blockade.

*Raymond D’Aguilers was a chronicler of the First Crusade. He was also Count Raymond’s priest.

Sources Used:

Asbridge, Thomas. The Crusades: The Authoritative History of The War For The Holy Land. Ecco; New York, 2011.

Hindley, Geoffrey. A Brief History of The Crusades. Constable & Robinson, Ltd; London, 2003.

Yewdale, Ralph B. Bohemond I, Prince of Antioch. Princeton University Press; Princeton, 1917.

 

Categories: The First Crusade, The Siege of Antioch | Tags: , , , , | Leave a comment

At the Walls of Antioch

In the fall of 1097, the crusading army marched on to the city of Antioch, a Muslim-held city located near the Syrian border (in southeastern Turkey). The crusaders could have easily negotiated a truce with the Muslim garrison and passed through the Antiochene countryside unharmed. But that was one chance they were not willing to take. The crusaders knew that if they left Antioch in Muslim control, they would cut themselves off from their allies, thus giving the Turks the upper hand in strategy. The crusaders needed help from Emperor Alexius I Comnenus and, whether they liked it or not, they were still bound to the oath of allegiance to him.

Antioch had at one time belonged to the Byzantine Empire. The city fell to the Muslims during the first Muslim expansion in the seventh century. The Byzantines recaptured the city in 969, but they didn’t keep it for long. The Seljuk Turks, advancing from the east, conquered Antioch in 1085.

Alexius coveted Antioch. He dreamt of the day when it would once again be the cornerstone of the Roman Empire (Byzantine Empire). Antioch’s close proximity to the Mediterranean Sea would allow for maritime trade, one that would profit Alexius and his empire greatly.

Antioch also held great spiritual significance for Greeks and Latins alike. According to the Bible, the Apostle Peter (later canonized St. Peter) founded the first Christian Church in Antioch. In fact, a large Basilica had been built there, dedicated to St. Peter.

Alexius, unfortunately, had a powerful rival: his arch enemy, Bohemond of Taranto. Bohemond wanted Antioch for himself and he was determined to have it even if it meant for him to break his oath of allegiance to Alexius. Bohemond was undoubtedly supported by his own troops and by other crusaders, including his own nephew, Tancred. Although, not every crusader supported Bohemond’s cause: Raymond of Toulouse firmly believed that Antioch, should they capture it, be handed over to the emperor as promised. Raymond schemed to thwart Bohemond’s plans to claim Antioch.

It is quite possible that Raymond wanted a principality for himself – even though he didn’t want Antioch – and he certainly didn’t want Bohemond, a lesser yet equally formidable rival, obtain access to land and wealth before he did. Regardless, this clash of interest within the crusading army drove the wedge between them deeper.

Unbeknownst to Alexius as to what Bohemond was really up to, he was ready and willing to help the Franks. Alexius had prepared to send a contingent of Greek warriors by sea to defend them. The crusaders themselves had maintained communication with the west. Those Latin warriors, who didn’t take up the cross in late 1095 and early 1096, now did so with the desire to aid their brethren at Antioch.

Confident that this help would come, the crusaders secured safe passage through the Belen Pass, the quickest, most direct route from Asia Minor to Syria. They arrived at the walls of Antioch in late October.

Sources Used:

Asbridge, Thomas. The Crusades: The Authoritative History of The War For The Holy Land. Ecco; New York, 2011.

 

Categories: The First Crusade, The Siege of Antioch | Tags: , , , , , | Leave a comment

Baldwin Betrays Thoros

As heir to and co-regent of Edessa, Baldwin’s first task was to repel the Turks, a task he set out to accomplish with much vigor. With a force of knights and Edessene mercenaries, Baldwin embarked on an expedition against Samasota, the neighboring emirate. He was accompanied by the Armenian princeling, Constantine of Gargar, a vassal to Thoros. The Edessenes, though, were poorly trained soldiers, and they weren’t well equipped. They were crushed by the Turks, a thousand of them slaughtered in the event. Baldwin, though, had better luck simply because of how skilled he and his troops were in the art of warfare.

Baldwin managed to capture St. John, a village situated near the Emir’s capital. He then fortified the village and ordered his knights to patrol the roads leading to and from Edessa. This resulted in a sharp decline in Turkish raids, giving the Edessenes reason to celebrate Baldwin’s prowess. His victory foreshadowed Thoros’s fate.

Sometime in February 1098, a conspiracy against Thoros was hatched. The people of Edessa, including Constantine of Gargar, plotted to dethrone Thoros in favor of Baldwin. Historians continue to debate over Baldwin’s involvement in this conspiracy. His friends, including the famed historian, Fulcher of Chartres, claimed Baldwin’s innocence. Besides, the Armenian Christians have always resented Thoros’s allegiance to the emperor Alexius I Comnenus and the Greek Orthodox Church. They hated him even more for the heavy taxes he forced them to pay. Above all, Thoros was unable to defend them. Understandably, the Edessenes wanted to replace Thoros with a leader who would protect and look after their best interests.

It was quite likely that Baldwin did support the conspirators given how determined he was to rule over Edessa. The Armenian chronicler, Matthew of Edessa, writing in the twelfth century, suggests that Baldwin did in fact betray Thoros. “Baldwin discovered evil counselors in Edessa, traitors who plotted with him to have Thoros killed and promised to hand Edessa over to him. Baldwin agreed to join them.”

Thoros, terrified and deserted by everyone, offered Baldwin a large amount of treasure: gold, silver and purple robes in exchange for his life. Moved by the Duke’s pleas, Baldwin “pleaded for him resolutely with the people’s leaders and urged that they should spare the prince.” But it was too late. The people wanted Thoros dead. “Baldwin and his people were greatly saddened at this since they were unable to obtain mercy for the prince,” Fulcher wrote.

In early March, the conspirators struck. Thoros attempted to escape by climbing out of the window in his throne room. He scaled the wall, but was shot down in the street by a raging mob. “Cutting off his head, they carried it fixed on a spear through all the quarters of the city for everyone to mock,” Matthew of Edessa wrote.

No one knows what had happened to Thoros’s wife because no evidence was recorded.

Baldwin Becomes the Count of Edessa

Baldwin had achieved what he set out to accomplish: he had obtained the principality of Edessa.

Edessa wasn’t in the Holy Land, Baldwin realized. It was in Asia Minor. But Baldwin realized that a Frankish state near the Euphrates would be militarily and economically advantageous to any Frankish state that might be set up in Palestine. He also discovered untold wealth in his principality: a vast store of treasure in the citadel, Thoros’s taxes. Those treasures enabled Baldwin to buy support from the Armenian Christians and also gave him the means to strengthen Edessa against the Turks.

Baldwin did not have much to worry about, though, because the Emir Balduk of Samasota was terrified of him. When he learnt that Baldwin was preparing to attack his city, he offered to sell his Emirate to the Frankish prince for ten thousand bezants. Baldwin gladly accepted this offer, making him wealthier. He made sure the Arabs living within his realm were leaderless, but allowed them the freedom to practice their religion.

Thanks to Baldwin, the decades long Turkish threat to the Armenian principalities in Asia Minor came to an end. When other crusaders learnt about his success, they were envious. Baldwin, once penniless, now possessed greater wealth and power than Raymond, Count of Toulouse. Under Baldwin’s leadership, Edessa flourished economically.

Baldwin persuaded several knights to abandon the siege of Antioch and join him at Edessa. He rewarded these men handsomely from his treasuring, urged them to marry Armenian ladies and appointed made them his vassals.

As for the Armenians; they were not much better off than they were under Thoros’s rule. Baldwin taxed them equally as heavily and exempt their men from high ranking positions in society. Yet, as deeply as the Armenians resented that, they didn’t dare revolt against Baldwin. He was, after all, their protector. Without him, Edessa would be doomed and so would all of the neighboring Armenian principalities.

Sources Used:

Krey, August C. The First Crusade: The Accounts of Eye-Witnesss and Participants. Princeton; Princeton University Press, 1921.

Runciman, Steven. A History of the Crusades: The First Crusade. Vol.1. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 1951.

Various contributors. Chronicles of the Crusades: Eye-Witness Accounts of The Wars Between Christianity and Islam. Bramley Books; Portugal, 1997.

Categories: The Armenian Issue, The First Crusade | Tags: , , , , | Leave a comment

Thoros of Edessa Appealed to Baldwin for Military Aid

In the middle of October 1097, Baldwin of Boulogne, with a small force, journeyed towards to Armenia, while the rest of the crusading army ambled on south towards Antioch. Bagrat was still with him, but Baldwin had gained another prominent individual: the historian, Fulcher of Chartres.

The Armenian Christians wanted desperately to be liberated from the Seljuk Turks and from Byzantine domination. They were eager to work with the crusaders, so as Baldwin approached the Euphrates, they greeted him with much joy and joined forces with him. With the help of Baldwin’s force, the Armenians slaughtered the Turks and conquered their formerly held territory all the way up to where the Euphrates River cut through the land. In the event, Baldwin captured two fortresses: Ravendel and Turbessel, two fortresses that held significant strategic importance for his success. Ravendel was connected directly with Antioch via road, allowing for Baldwin to maintain communication with the rest of the crusading army. Turbessel, on the other hand, was located close to a fjord beside the Euphrates River. The land there was fertile and the river provided plenty of fresh water for the locals who lived there.

Three months later, in early 1098, an embassy from Edessa reached Baldwin in Turbessel. Thoros, the aging and childless Duke of Edessa, was desperate for aid against the Turks. Thoros had recently learnt that Kerbogha, the Turkish Emir of Mosul, was assembling a large army, preparing to march westward and capture Antioch and every Armenian principality that lay north of it. Thoros had also learnt that the great Frankish prince, Baldwin of Boulogne, was nearby. So, Thoros appealed to Baldwin for military aid.

“Baldwin was asked by the Duke to go there, and to agree that they should be mutual friends as long as they both should live, that they should be like father and son,” Fulcher wrote. Hungry for more land and wealth, Baldwin rode with his troops and an Armenian escort to greet Thoros in Edessa.

503px-Baldwin_of_Boulogne_entering_Edessa_in_Feb_1098

Baldwin of Boulogne entering Edessa in February 1098. There, he is greeted by Thoros.

At Edessa, Baldwin was welcomed enthusiastically by the entire Christian population and by Thoros, who immediately and publicly adopted Baldwin as his son. The two men stripped down to their waist, then put on a double wide shirt – one that fit both men comfortably – and rubbed their bare chests together.

Thoros and the Armenians looked upon Baldwin as their savior because they had not the military might or the arms available to crush the Turks, who frequently and viciously raided the Edessene flock and fields, terrorizing the populace. But now, they no longer had a reason to fear the Turks because Baldwin promised to crush the neighboring emirate of Samosata for good. Baldwin also wanted to take Thoros’s place as Duke of Edessa and he did not keep those intentions to himself.

Sources Used:

Krey, August C. The First Crusade: The Accounts of Eye-Witnesss and Participants. Princeton; Princeton University Press, 1921.

Runciman, Steven. A History of the Crusades: The First Crusade. Vol.1. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 1951.

 

 

Categories: The Armenian Issue, The First Crusade | Tags: , , , , , , | 1 Comment